Sellers still occupying home on Vancouver's west side that they sold for $3.9 million a year ago
The former owners of a home on Vancouver's west side have continued living in it despite selling it for nearly $4 million last June. Last week, they won a court case that will prevent the new owners from evicting them for at least a little while longer.
Feng Xia Liu and Lian Bin Feng were the owners of a home on West 36th Avenue, according to B.C. Supreme Court Justice Kevin D. Loo's decision, which was issued Friday and posted online Monday.
In April 2023, Liu and Feng entered a contract of purchase and sale with Shan Guang Wang and Hua Yun Zhang, in which they agreed to sell the property for $3.9 million.
The sale closed on June 15, 2023, but before closing, the buyers and sellers entered a residential tenancy agreement that would allow Liu and Feng to continue living in the home through the end of September.
The rental agreement was dated May 1, 2023, according to Loo's decision. It called for Liu and Feng to pay $5,500 a month in rent, and required them to maintain the property and continue paying utility bills.
As quoted in the decision, the contract of purchase and sale acknowledged the tenancy agreement, noting that "the seller is not required to pay a security deposit," but the buyers would "hold back" $100,000 from the purchase price until shortly before the end of the tenancy.
"Since Sept. 30, 2023, when the fixed term under the tenancy agreement ended, the petitioners have taken the position that they are entitled to continue to live in the property on a month-to-month tenancy and that rent ought to be paid from the $100,000 holdback, from the end of September 2023 forward," Loo's decision reads.
RTB decisions
Despite continuing to reside in the home, Liu and Feng applied for dispute resolution with the province's Residential Tenancy Branch in December 2023, according to the court document.
They argued that the holdback was a security deposit, and sought to have the RTB order Wang and Zhang to pay it to them, with interest, plus a "statutory penalty for wrongful withholding of deposit."
The court decision indicates that in February of this year, an RTB arbitrator concluded that the holdback was not a security deposit, citing – among other reasons – the clause in the contract of purchase and sale that said no such deposit was required.
Wang and Zhang responded to the RTB ruling by issuing the tenants a 10-day notice to end tenancy for unpaid rent on March 1.
Liu and Feng filed a dispute against this notice, again turning to the RTB for arbitration.
The second RTB case was heard in April, with the arbitrator concluding that the previous RTB decision holding that the holdback was not a security deposit meant that the tenants were, indeed, in arrears of rent.
The arbitrator issued an order of possession in favour of Wang and Zhang, but that order was stayed when Liu and Feng petitioned the B.C. Supreme Court for judicial review of the two RTB decisions.
Loo's decision was the result of that judicial review petition.
'Patently unreasonable'
The judge noted that because the second RTB decision relied on the determination about the holdback made in the first RTB decision, both decisions would either be upheld or quashed based on an analysis of the arbitrator's reasoning about the holdback.
Loo found the arbitrator's finding that the holdback was not a security deposit "defective for at least two reasons."
First, the arbitrator based his reasoning, in part, on the conclusion that the holdback was not related to or contingent upon the condition of the unit. Loo's decision notes that this interpretation of the purpose of a security deposit is too restrictive, citing the Residential Tenancy Act, which defines security deposits as being "for any liability or obligation of the tenant respecting the residential property."
Second, the clause in the contract of purchase and sale did, in fact, tie the holdback to the condition of the unit when it noted that the seller was obliged to maintain the property.
"It is my view that the $100,000 holdback was clearly a security deposit as that term is defined in the (Residential Tenancy Act)," Loo's decision reads.
"It is clear that the holdback was intended, on the face of the documents, to secure obligations of the tenant with respect to the property. The respondents have not been able to identify any other viable reason for its imposition."
Further, the judge noted that, as a general legal principle, the labels parties place on their relationships "are not determinative." The question of whether the holdback was a security deposit must be answered by its function and the legal definition of the term, not how it was described in the tenancy agreement.
"In my view, the fact that the parties chose not to call the holdback a security deposit could not have, by itself, reasonably led the arbitrator to conclude that the holdback was not a security deposit given that the holdback clearly fell within the definition of a security deposit in (the RTA)," Loo's decision reads.
Having reached this conclusion, the judge ruled that the first RTB decision should be quashed for being "patently unreasonable," and the second should be quashed for relying on it.
He stayed the order of possession that would have allowed the buyers to evict the sellers, and ordered the RTB to reconsider the issues underlying both decisions. He also awarded court costs to Liu and Feng, as the successful parties in the litigation.
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
'You are not my king,' Indigenous Australian senator yells at visiting King Charles
An Indigenous senator told King Charles III that Australia is not his land as the royal visited Australia's parliament on Monday.
opinion Seven ways to help you save on everyday expenses
In his column for CTVNews.ca, personal finance contributor Christopher Liew shares some of the best ways to save on everyday expenses, to help you keep up with life and get back on top of your financial health.
Precedent-setting terrorism lawsuit hearings begin in federal court
After waiting 15 years, Canadian Abousfian Abdelrazik will finally get the chance to hold the federal government accountable for its alleged complicity which led to his imprisonment and torture in Sudan.
How an off-duty lifeguard found a missing 17-year-old in the ocean
It was a typical Wednesday evening for Noland Keaulana, who was fixing his truck at his grandparents’ house when he received an alert on his phone about a 17-year-old missing off the Honolulu coast.
Cubans struggle with an extended power outage and a new tropical storm
Cuba's widespread blackouts stretched into their fourth day as Hurricane Oscar crossed the island's eastern coast with winds and heavy rain.
Crowd in Egypt attacks a railway guard after 2 children are run over
Angry residents attacked a railway guard and his post in a town outside Cairo on Monday after a train ran over and killed two children crossing a train intersection that was closed to pedestrians, officials said.
'It was a good choice': This U.S. couple say their living costs dropped by nearly US$3,000 a month when they moved to Italy
The retired elementary teachers, Tony and Francine Smarrelli, originally from Syracuse, New York, resolved to leave the U.S. and move to Italy for good. They say they’ve cut back nearly US$3,000 per month on expenses, which amounts to US$36,000 a year, since moving there permanently.
Jennifer Lawrence expecting second child with husband Cooke Maroney
Jennifer Lawrence will soon be a mom of two. The Oscar-winning actress is pregnant with her second child, a representative for Lawrence told Vogue on Sunday.
Minimum wage of some temporary foreign workers set to change
The federal government is expected to boost the minimum hourly wage that must be paid to temporary foreign workers in the high-wage stream as a way to encourage employers to hire more Canadian staff.