Surrey homeowners fined for continuing to rent out illegal suites despite court order
Homeowners in Surrey who turned a single-family home into an "unauthorized and unpermitted" four-plex could be on the hook for as much as $19,000 after defying a court order telling them to stop renting out the suites, a judge has ruled.
A B.C. Supreme Court decision posted online Tuesday outlines the history of the dispute between the City of Surrey and property owners Sukhdev Singh and Kashmir Singh Sahota.
According to the court documents, the home was purchased in 2021 and the owners proceeded with "extensive renovations." By March of 2022, a two-suite addition had been built and a secondary suite had been added.
"The City of Surrey alleges the respondents did so without permits or required inspections and contrary to the 'stop work' orders, tickets, warnings from the City of Surrey, and the applicable bylaws," the court heard.
CONTEMPT OF THE INJUNCTION
In April, the city applied for and was granted an injunction that ordered the owners to stop renting out the units. In September, they were found in contempt of that order.
"Despite the April order, the respondents continued to use the addition and the secondary suite as three separate rental units, which have been occupied by third parties in exchange for payment to the respondents," Justice John Gibb-Carsley wrote, summarizing his decision to find them in contempt.
"The respondents have also been using the upper floor of the house as a fourth rental unit for tenants."
THE PENALTY
At a November hearing, Gibb-Carsley provided his reasons for imposing an immediate financial penalty of $6,000 for the breach of the court order and a further $13,000 to be paid if the suites remain occupied on Jan. 1, 2023.
The City of Surrey argued that the owners made no attempt to "purge the contempt" by having the tenants vacate the property. The judge's decision noted that the owners provided signed agreements from three of the tenants saying they would leave – but that they were dated only one day before the hearing.
For their part, the owners told the court they knew they were violating city bylaws and the court order by renovating and renting the suites.
"The respondents stated that they 'never thought it would get this far.' They said that so many other people in Surrey are doing the same thing—that is, building and renting suites without permission—that they did not think this would happen," the decision says.
Singh and Sahota said they have "made sincere efforts" and spent a considerable amount of money trying to retroactively get the necessary building permits from the city.
Further, they said it was difficult to get the tenants to leave because "the respondents charge a low rent and … it is very difficult to find similar rental accommodations in the Lower Mainland." However, the judge said he had seen no evidence that there had been "concrete efforts" made to remove the tenants.
THE NEED FOR DETERRENCE
Gibb-Carsley, when explaining why he ordered the fine that he did, stressed the need to deter people from "blatantly" disregarding court orders. He also agreed with the City of Surrey that there are potential safety consequences to flouting building codes and the permitting process – even if these particular suites did not present any immediate danger.
"The practice of offering unlawful suites for rent and inviting members of the public to occupy uninspected buildings without occupancy permits to my mind poses at least a theoretical risk to the health and safety of the community," he wrote.
"To think otherwise would render the municipal building and occupancy bylaws meaningless."
In considering an appropriate penalty for the owners if they continue to rent out the suites past the Dec. 31 deadline, the judge said it needed to be significant enough to "blunt any financial incentives the respondents may have in continuing to remain in contempt."
Singh and Sahota have also been ordered to pay the municipality's legal costs.
"Given the City of Surrey is a local government, funded by taxpayers’ dollars, and was required to incur the costs of these contempt proceedings solely because of the respondents’ actions, it is appropriate," Gibb-Carsley wrote.
"I have some sympathy for the respondents and their stated belief that they could apply after the fact to remedy their various infractions. However, in my view, their actions have forced the City of Surrey to take steps and incur costs to enforce orders of this court."
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
Spectacular aurora light show to be seen across Canada Friday night
A rare and severe solar storm is expected to bring spectacular displays of the northern lights, also known as aurora borealis, across much of Canada and parts of the United States on Friday night.
Town of Fort Nelson, B.C., ordered to evacuate due to wildfire
The entire town of Fort Nelson, B.C., as well as the nearby Fort Nelson First Nation, has been ordered to evacuate due to an out-of-control wildfire.
Bouchard lifts Edmonton Oilers to 4-3 overtime win over Canucks in Game 2
Evan Bouchard scored 5:38 into overtime and the Edmonton Oilers bounced back for a 4-3 win over the Vancouver Canucks in the second round of the Stanley Cup playoffs on Friday.
McGill University seeks emergency injunction to dismantle pro-Palestinian encampment
McGill University has filed a request for an injunction to have the pro-Palestinian encampment removed from its campus.
Which Canadian cities have the highest and lowest grocery prices?
Where you live plays a big factor in what you pay at the grocery store. And while it's no secret the same item may have a different price depending on the store, city or province, we wanted to see just how big the differences are, and why.
Swarm of 20,000 bees gather around woman’s car west of Toronto
A swarm of roughly 20,000 bees gathered around a woman’s car in the parking lot of Burlington Centre.
Video shows naked raccoon catching B.C. family by surprise
When Marvin Henschel spotted a strange and hairless creature wandering through a front lawn in B.C.'s Lower Mainland, he could barely believe his eyes.
Barron Trump declines to serve as an RNC delegate
Former U.S. President Donald Trump's youngest son, Barron Trump, has declined to serve as a delegate at this summer’s Republican National Convention, according to a senior Trump campaign adviser and a statement from Melania Trump's office.
Out-of-control wildfire prompts evacuation alert for Fort McMurray, Saprae Creek Estates Friday night
An evacuation alert was issued for two Wood Buffalo communities Friday night, as crews battled an out-of-control wildfire near Fort McMurray.