Details of decapitation case, including adopted persona, body in suitcase, rehashed in B.C. court
Warning: This article contains graphic descriptions of a Metro Vancouver murder case. Reader discretion is advised.
A man convicted of the gruesome murder of his roommate more than a decade ago was back in a British Columbia court recently, trying to argue he is not criminally responsible for the death.
Ernest Allan Hosack appeared before a panel of B.C. Court of Appeal judges this week to hear a judgment after arguing his conviction should be overturned.
His legal team told the court during a hearing back in December that Hosack's trial judge should not have allowed the use of a statement he'd made to police as evidence. Lawyers said too that he should have been found not criminally responsible by account of mental disorder, and that the proceedings should have been stayed.
The judges disagreed, dismissing the efforts in a judgment on Tuesday.
Their reasons, posted online, outlined details that came out during Hosack's trial over the second-degree murder of Richard Falardeau in 2008.
The court heard that Falardeau, who was 54 when he died, met his convicted killer when Hosack, then a stranger, defended him in some kind of altercation at a Starbucks location.
The men got to talking, and Hosack ended up moving in to Falardeau's attic suite for some time. Their living arrangement ended when Hosack was arrested on an unrelated matter and held in custody for about a month.
Two days after Hosack was released, Falardeau mentioned to their landlord he wanted a lock for the attic suite, saying he and Hosack weren't getting along, but that lock was never installed.
The next few days involve a series of strange events that ultimately led to Hosack's arrest in the killing, court documents outline.
HOSACK FOUND INJURED, ARRESTED IN STOLEN CAR
Hosack, who'd been released from custody on July 14, was found by police on July 20 asleep in a wooded area of Surrey. He had a head laceration, and was taken to hospital for treatment.
The next day, officers in Delta saw him "driving erratically in a stolen car" and he was arrested.
Police said they searched the car and found a knife in the trunk with Falardeau's DNA on it, the court heard. There was also a drawing of a figure "wielding a double-bladed axe having just decapitated a person on a tree stump" in the vehicle, according to police.
They said Hosack co-operated when he was arrested, but then started acting delusional while inside police holding cells.
GRAPHIC CONTENT: DISCOVERY OF VICTIM'S BODY
Meanwhile, the flies started swarming around the attic apartment and the house itself. The landlord and a tenant looked for the source, entered the suite and found a bad smell.
They saw no sign of the apartment's occupant and left. That was in early August.
On Aug. 14, a police officer showed up after Falardeau was reported missing. The officer didn't go into the suite at the time, but returned six days later.
It was then that they made two disturbing discoveries.
Officers said they found Falardeau's badly decomposed body in a suitcase in the bathroom closet. His body was missing some parts, including his head.
The next day, they found some of those parts in a bag inside a freezer: the victim's thumbs, anus and testes.
It was not until three months later that Falardeau's head was found in a Surrey hydro right-of-way.
HOSACK ADOPTS GRANDFATHER'S PERSONALITY
Hosack had been in a provincial jail during this time, and remained there until May 2009. Upon his release, he was immediately arrested again, this time for the murder.
The interview that followed was one of the subjects of Hosack's appeal. He said it shouldn't have been deemed admissible during his trial.
The appeal judges summarized it as follows.
Hosack was asked about the murder, but denied it initially. Later in the interview, however, he "adopted the persona of his deceased grandfather, whom he called 'Ernie Gootchie Gootchie Koo.'"
"Speaking in the grandfather persona, Hosack told officers that spirits had taken Mr. Falardeau and that he (the grandfather persona) had ordered Mr. Falardeau's dismemberment," the judges said.
"Among other things, Mr. Hosack also told them that Mr. Falardeau's thumbs and genitals were removed, that he died quickly and that he (Mr. Hosack) saw him (the grandfather persona) 'snap his head off like a twig.'"
Quoted in the decision from the Court of Appeal are parts of the interview, in which Hosack told police that Falardeau died "faster than he ever thought possible," and that "he couldn't have felt it more than a second."
At one point, an officer asked what word Hosack would call what he witnessed, to which Hosack (in his grandfather persona) replied, "Because he's seen both sides he'd say it's God's will or an act of God."
"And what would I call it?" the officer asks.
"You would call it murder or whatever," Hosack replies.
Hosack was charged and tried, and while his defence team argued the Crown failed to prove Hosack killed Falardeau, the judge admitted the statement to police and sided with Crown.
The judge outlined specific actions and how certain parts of Falardeau's body were removed. Those details will not be included here.
Defence was given time before a formal conviction to decide whether to argue that Hosack was not criminally responsible (NCR).
Hosack fired his lawyers and hired new counsel, then tried to argue that he fit the definition of NCR. That application was dismissed in 2017, and Hosack was sentenced to life in prison a few months later.
He is not eligible for parole for 15 years.
WHY WASN'T HE FOUND NOT CRIMINALLY RESPONSIBLE?
As for the NCR ruling, a doctor spoke to the court at the hearing, was cross-examined by lawyers and was even questioned by Hosack himself.
That doctor told the court that Hosack said he was intoxicated with alcohol and cocaine, and that he'd found Falardeau already dead in the attic apartment. His reason for the dismemberment was that he'd hoped it would lead Hells Angels to believe Hosack was dead, and thus he'd be safe.
That expert said Hosack "did not suffer from any symptoms of a psychotic illness involving the victim, which would exempt him from criminal responsibility."
"One cannot extrapolate from unexplained bizarre behaviour to a conclusion that it was driven by a delusion," the doctor said during the trial.
He said he couldn't definitively say whether Hosack had a mental disorder at the time, or that he would appreciate the consequences of the act, but the judge said based on a balance of probabilities there was no way to tell. The argument was dismissed and Hosack was sentenced.
'POLICE TRICKERY': THE APPEAL
Back in court to appeal both the admission of the statement made to police and that he wasn't found NCR, Hosack argued that the trial judge failed to consider whether his statement was voluntary.
As summarized by the appeals court judges, he submitted that the judge did not look into the context of the interview, including whether there were any "threats and inducements, oppression, operating mind issues and police trickery."
Hosack alleged that police were abusive to him in their treatment, keeping him in custody for hours and "preying on his delusions, paranoia, social isolation and mental illness."
He told the court a female officer flirted with him in an effort to exploit his vulnerability, and there was a veiled threat that he'd be charged with premeditated murder.
He said this context around his statement should have made it inadmissible.
He said it was wrong to infer Falardeau's death was intentional, as the evidence was entirely circumstantial. He said the trial judge failed to provide him with the proper assistance at his NCR hearing, and that they didn't stay the proceedings given "long delays" between different stages in the process.
Hosack brought to the Court of Appeal a written report by a forensic pathologist, in which the expert said the fractures noted to Falardeau's hyoid bone – often seen in strangulation cases – did not necessarily occur as the man was dying. The fractures could have been caused by dismemberment or later, by animals, the doctor said.
The bone was found six metres from Falardeau's skull, a summary of the argument says, information that was not provided to the expert who testified at the original trial.
THE DECISION
The panel of appeal judges disagreed with Hosack's argument that the Crown's case was entirely circumstantial, and described the statement's admission as "direct evidence" that he was behind Falardeau's death.
They agreed that some of the trial judge's language was "arguably imprecise," including a reference to Hosack's "homicidal state of mind," but didn't feel the wording reflected a legal error.
Also, they agreed the trial judge could have more clearly explained his reasoning.
"However, those imperfections do not undermine the validity of the verdict."
They said they felt the verdict was reasonable and the analysis was "error-free."
They said the evidence from the new pathologist on what could have caused the hyoid bone fractures wouldn't have changed anything, so it wouldn't be admitted.
The pathologist who testified in the trial was open about not being able to reach a definite conclusion on cause of death based on the physical evidence. Another pathologist whose argument essentially amounted to the same thing wouldn't change the decision.
This time around, the court with the trial judge on the admission of the statement to police and on the NCR ruling, saying there were no grounds for an appeal.
The case was dismissed, and Hosack remains in prison.
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
Stamp prices rise for the third time in five years amid financial woes for Canada Post
Canada Post is increasing stamp prices for the third time since 2019, a move the Crown corporation says is a "reality" of its sales-based revenue structure.
BREAKING Winnipeg man admits to killing four women, claims he's not criminally responsible
Defence lawyers of Jeremy Skibicki have admitted in court the accused killed four Indigenous women in Winnipeg, but argues he is not criminally responsible for the deaths by way of mental disorder – this latest development has triggered a judge-alone trial rather than a jury trial.
Trudeau Liberals to unveil new bill Monday aimed at countering foreign interference
Democratic Institutions Minister Dominic LeBlanc will be tabling legislation on Monday aimed at countering foreign interference in Canada. Federal officials have scheduled a technical briefing on the incoming bill for Monday afternoon.
WATCH Avian flu: Risk to humans grows as outbreaks spread, warns expert
H5N1 or avian flu is decimating wildlife around the world and is now spreading among cattle in the United States, sparking concerns about 'pandemic potential' for humans. Now a health expert is urging Canada to scale up surveillance north of the border.
Human remains were found at a former Hitler base, but decay prevents determining the cause of death
Polish prosecutors have discontinued an investigation into human skeletons found at a site where German dictator Adolf Hitler and other Nazi leaders spent time during the Second World War because the advanced state of decay made it impossible to determine the cause of death, a spokesman said Monday.
Italy's white-collar mafia is making a business killing
Italy's mafia rarely dirties its hands with blood these days. Extortion rackets have gone out of fashion and murders are largely frowned upon by the godfathers.
Ontario MPP asked again to leave Ontario legislature over keffiyeh, Speaker loosens ban
An Ontario MPP was asked again to leave the Ontario legislature on Monday for wearing a keffiyeh, a garment that was banned by the Speaker last month due to its political symbolism.
The story of how a B.C. man found his birth mother
After his adopted parents died, Dave Rogers set out to learn more about his birth mother. DNA results and a little help from friendly strangers would put him on a path to a small town in England.
Trump fined US$1,000 for gag order violation in hush money case as judge warns of possible jail time
The judge presiding over Donald Trump's hush money trial fined him US$1,000 on Monday for violating his gag order once again and sternly warned the former president that additional violations could result in jail time.