Metro Vancouver lawyer suspended for 'frankly startling' misconduct, tribunal rules
A Metro Vancouver lawyer is barred from practising law for five months after a disciplinary tribunal found he committed professional misconduct by making false statements and acted in a conflict of interest when he represented both sides in a family law dispute.
Pir Indar Paul Singh Sahota of Surrey was also ordered to pay $15,927 in legal costs and disbursements to the Law Society of British Columbia following the misconduct finding.
"The hearing panel took into consideration the fact Sahota has been a lawyer for 40 years and should, by this point, understand the undivided duty of loyalty a lawyer owes to their client, his lack of understanding of his misconduct along with an absence of a commitment to change, and his previous professional conduct record," the society said in the suspension notice last week.
The disciplinary hearing began last August, five months after Sahota was found to have violated the law society's code of conduct by serving conflicting roles as counsel for a husband and later as counsel for the wife in the same family law case. Sahota also prepared a filing that contained untrue statements, and filed an affidavit that contained confidential client information, according to the disciplinary decision.
The untrue statements noted in the decision were found in a letter Sahota had prepared in October 2020, releasing himself as counsel for the husband in the case.
According to the tribunal, the letter stated the husband had not discussed financial or employment matters with the lawyer, and did not disclose to him any confidential documents. The tribunal found Sahota should have known those claims to be misleading or untrue.
The lawyer also claimed to have witnessed the husband's signature on the letter, "when he knew or should have known that was not true," the tribunal said.
'Frankly startling' behaviour
Four months later, Sahota began representing the wife in the family claim, constituting a clear conflict of interest, the tribunal found. Sahota refused to withdraw from acting on behalf of the wife, and when the husband filed an application to have him disqualified from the case, Sahota prepared and filed with the court an affidavit containing confidential information, including the husband's driver's licence and details of the husband's objectives in the family law claim, according to the tribunal.
"The (lawyer's) actions in this case, taken individually and holistically, are frankly startling, especially for someone with his length of call, not just in B.C., but before that in India, some 40 years in total," the tribunal wrote in its decision.
"They strike at the core of a lawyer's undivided duty of loyalty to a client, and show a complete lack of understanding by the respondent of that fundamental duty."
In weighing an appropriate punishment for the misconduct, the tribunal considered Sahota's professional conduct record, which includes two prior suspensions for misconduct.
Prior suspensions for misconduct
In 2017, the lawyer was suspended for 90 days after he was found to have committed seven instances of misconduct related to inappropriate accounting practices.
"The state of the financial records of the respondent (Sahota) at all material times was beyond description," the earlier disciplinary panel found. "The English language has insufficient adjectives to pay proper respect to the mess that was the financial records of the respondent."
The same panel found Sahota was so "guilty of negligence and gross incompetence" that he likely did not even understand his duty to his clients.
"So comprehensively inept is he that it may not be appropriate to characterize his behaviour as negligent," the disciplinary panel wrote. "Negligence suggests that there has been dereliction of a duty owed. That characterization requires there to be an understanding of an initial duty that is owed. Nothing in the evidence before us suggests that the respondent was aware of the duty owed to clients in the financial administration of his practice."
In 2019, Sahota's second suspension barred him from practising law for 30 days and prohibited him from engaging in any capacity in a real estate transaction after his involvement in a botched real estate deal.
"The respondent breached his undertakings, ignored opposing counsel, and failed both to manage his staff and to run a disciplined office," the second disciplinary panel found. "His conduct falls short of the quality of service expected of a competent lawyer."
'Conduct was clearly blameworthy'
In the present case, Sahota defended his record before the disciplinary hearing, arguing his actions in the first misconduct case arose from simple carelessness on his part, and did not benefit him personally. On the second case, he argued he did not commit fraud or misappropriate any funds but merely failed to provide a document to another lawyer, the tribunal heard.
"It is clear from his submissions that the respondent still does not understand the import of the prior findings of professional misconduct against him," the panel wrote.
"His conduct was clearly blameworthy in both cases. This lack of understanding, combined with the panel’s findings in this case, raises concerns about the respondent’s fundamental lack of comprehension of the very basics of his duties and obligations as a lawyer."
The panel found that Sahota's misconduct in representing both the husband and the wife in the same legal matter wasted the couple's time, money and emotional energy.
"On the eve of the hearing in the family law proceeding, the wife was without a lawyer," the panel said. "The husband was betrayed by his former lawyer and had his confidential information used against him in a public courtroom by that lawyer."
Sahota was licensed to practise law in India in 1983 and was admitted to the bar in B.C. in 2006, according to the panel. He practised law at two Metro Vancouver firms before starting Sahota Law Corporation in January 2008, focusing on matters of family and criminal law.
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
Parents of infant who died in wrong-way crash on Ontario's Hwy. 401 were in same vehicle
Ontario’s Special Investigations Unit has released new details about a wrong-way collision in Whitby on Monday night that claimed the lives of four people.
Three Quebec men from same family father hundreds of children
Three men in Quebec from the same family have fathered more than 600 children.
B.C. mayor stripped of budget, barred from committees over Indigenous residential schools book
A British Columbia mayor has been censured by city council – stripping him of his travel and lobbying budgets and removing him from city committees – for allegedly distributing a book that questions the history of Indigenous residential schools in Canada.
Jurors in Trump hush money trial hear recording of pivotal call on plan to buy affair story
Jurors in the hush money trial of Donald Trump heard a recording Thursday of him discussing with his then-lawyer and personal fixer a plan to purchase the silence of a Playboy model who has said she had an affair with the former president.
Captain sentenced to 4 years for criminal negligence in fiery deaths of 34 aboard scuba boat
A federal judge on Thursday sentenced a scuba dive boat captain to four years in custody and three years supervised release for criminal negligence after 34 people died in a fire aboard the vessel.
New scam targets Canada Carbon Rebate recipients
Fake text message and email campaigns trying to get money and information out of unsuspecting Canadian taxpayers have started circulating, just months after the federal government rebranded the carbon tax rebate the Canada Carbon Rebate.
Southern Alberta store broken into by burly black bear
Staff at a small southern Alberta office supply store were shocked to find someone had broken into the business last week, but they were even more confused when they discovered the culprit was a bear.
Triple murder or manslaughter? Sudbury jury deliberating fate of man responsible for fatal firebombing
After a lengthy series of instructions from Justice Dan Cornell, a Sudbury jury is deliberating whether to find a suspect guilty of three counts of manslaughter or three counts of murder.
President Joe Biden calls Japan and India 'xenophobic' nations that do not welcome immigrants
President Joe Biden has called Japan and India “xenophobic” countries that do not welcome immigrants, lumping the two with adversaries China and Russia as he tried to explain their economic circumstances and contrasted the four with the U.S. on immigration.