B.C. man's constitutional challenge to property tax law rejected
The B.C. Supreme Court has rejected an unusual constitutional challenge that sought to invalidate the law that governs the assessment of property values in the province.
The challenge to the Assessment Act came in the form of three "stated cases" arising from appeals to the Property Assessment Appeal Board by property owner Sheldon Goldberg.
The appeals involved three separate properties, located in Vancouver, New Westminster and Surrey, respectively. Each one ended with the appeal board confirming the assessed value after rejecting requests from Goldberg for an in-person hearing and for confirmation that board members had taken an oath of impartiality, independence and honesty.
In each case, the board determined that an in-person hearing was not necessary, and declined to take the kind of oath Goldberg requested.
Goldberg sought to appeal the three appeal decisions to the B.C. Supreme Court, which is allowed under the Assessment Act, but only on questions of law.
Such appeals, known as "stated cases," are prepared by the Property Assessment Appeal Board, but contain questions of law posed by the property owner seeking to appeal.
THE QUESTIONS
Each of the three stated cases included the same three questions for the court, summarized in Justice Margot L. Fleming's decision as follows:
- Must or need the Property Assessment Review Panel and the Property Assessment Appeal Board take an oath or affirmation of independence and impartiality and honesty?
- Need the PAAB Chair (have) advised the panel hearing the case of the appellant’s previous request to state a case?
- Was there a right to an in-person hearing where witnesses are cross examined on substantial discrepancies and accuracy and independence?
According to the court decision, Goldberg took issue with the requirement that the board bring the case.
"During oral submissions Mr. Goldberg asked that 'further points of law' be considered, handing up a document and complaining that the board 'decided for me what I think is relevant,'" Fleming's decision reads.
Most of these "further points of law," which Fleming listed in the decision, were not phrased as questions, and the board determined that they couldn't be phrased as such. For this reason, it opted not to include them in the stated cases.
"Where the board refuses to include a question in a stated case, an appellant’s remedy is to seek judicial review of the refusal, which did not occur here," Fleming wrote. "Accordingly, I cannot and will not be considering questions other than the questions (from the stated case)."
Among the 15 items Goldberg sought to include that Fleming declined to consider were assertions that Property Assessment Review Panel and Property Assessment Appeal Board members should not vote, or should have to disclose for whom they voted. They should also have to disclose if they own property in the jurisdiction of the matter they're considering, he argued.
Goldberg also asserted that "anyone voting for (Surrey Mayor Doug) McCallum or (his party, the) Safe Surrey (Coalition)" should "be disqualified from sitting" on a panel reviewing his property assessment because he is "a non-resident elector in Surrey and did vote."
'ESSENTIALLY NO MERIT'
In addition to declining to weigh in on these matters, Fleming also declined to answer the questions from the stated cases.
"Regrettably, Mr. Goldberg’s written and oral submissions, which he himself characterized as disorganized, were often, if not mostly, tangential," the judge wrote.
"Clear throughout, however, was his view that the statutory scheme and the general and specific approach of the board does not accord with the demands of natural justice and procedural fairness. Mr. Goldberg’s primary complaint was that assessors, panel members and members of the board exercise their powers and responsibilities without having taken an oath or affirmation of independence and impartiality, which in his view is crucial to their function. Underlying this and other complaints is a belief 'the system' works against the taxpayer."
In dismissing the questions, Fleming wrote that "there is essentially no merit" to the issues Goldberg raised.
NO PROSPECT OF 'GETTING TO THE MERITS'
The judge reached a similar conclusion about the constitutional challenge, in which Goldberg argued that the Assessment Act violates section 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure.
"Mr. Goldberg did not allege any search or seizure or address the need for a reasonable expectation of privacy," Fleming wrote. "Instead he referred to any requirement to show a breach, which I take to mean a search, as ridiculous, arguing he does not want assessors on his property at all and his challenge is to the statutory power that would allow this to occur."
Absent an actual example of a search, Fleming concluded, there could be no assessment of its reasonableness.
"The notice (of constitutional question), Mr. Goldberg’s ongoing refusal to provide requested particulars, and his written and oral submissions make it clear there is no prospect of 'getting to the merits' in this case," the judge wrote. "I therefore dismiss his constitutional challenge."
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
An El Nino-less summer is coming. Here's what that could mean for Canada
As Canadians brace themselves for summer temperatures, forecasters say a weakening El Nino cycle doesn’t mean relief from the heat.
Stamp prices rise for the third time in five years amid financial woes for Canada Post
Canada Post is increasing stamp prices for the third time since 2019, a move the Crown corporation says is a "reality" of its sales-based revenue structure.
NDP calls out Conservatives for effort to squash pharmacare legislation
The federal New Democrats are calling out Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and his party for trying to block the bill that could pave the way for millions of Canadians to access birth control and diabetes coverage.
Winnipeg man admits to killing four women, argues he's not criminally responsible
Defence lawyers of Jeremy Skibicki have admitted in court the accused killed four Indigenous women, but argues he is not criminally responsible for the deaths by way of mental disorder – this latest development has triggered a judge-alone trial rather than a jury trial.
Mediterranean staple may lower your risk of death from dementia, study finds
A daily spoonful of olive oil could lower your risk of dying from dementia, according to a new study by Harvard scientists.
Ontario MPP asked again to leave Ontario legislature over keffiyeh, Speaker loosens ban
An Ontario MPP was asked again to leave the Ontario legislature on Monday for wearing a keffiyeh, a garment that was banned by the Speaker last month due to its political symbolism.
WATCH Avian flu: Risk to humans grows as outbreaks spread, warns expert
H5N1 or avian flu is decimating wildlife around the world and is now spreading among cattle in the United States, sparking concerns about 'pandemic potential' for humans. Now a health expert is urging Canada to scale up surveillance north of the border.
Trudeau Liberals to unveil new bill Monday aimed at countering foreign interference
Democratic Institutions Minister Dominic LeBlanc will be tabling legislation on Monday aimed at countering foreign interference in Canada. Federal officials have scheduled a technical briefing on the incoming bill for Monday afternoon.
Human remains were found at a former Hitler base, but decay prevents determining the cause of death
Polish prosecutors have discontinued an investigation into human skeletons found at a site where German dictator Adolf Hitler and other Nazi leaders spent time during the Second World War because the advanced state of decay made it impossible to determine the cause of death, a spokesman said Monday.