B.C. man awarded $5,000 in damages in first-of-its-kind intimate image case
In a first-of-its-kind case, a B.C. tribunal has ruled on a dispute involving the non-consensual sharing of intimate images, awarding damages and issuing orders that the photos be destroyed and taken offline.
The province introduced the Intimate Images Protection Act earlier this year giving the Civil Resolution Tribunal the jurisdiction to address these types of claims to provide an alternative to the more difficult, lengthy and potentially costly options of trying to pursue redress through criminal or civil court.
The tribunal published its first decision online Tuesday in a case where a "nearly nude" image of a man shared during a "flirtatious" exchange of direct messages was publicly posted by an anonymous account on the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter.
The plaintiff, identified by the initials B.D.S., brought the claim against a man who is identified by the initials M.W. This man, the decision says, was not responsible for the public social media post but was found to have shared images B.D.S sent him in a "private, intimate chat" without permission.
"The internet does not forget. While M.W. did not post them, by sharing the images he lost control of them. Even if the images are removed from X, it is impossible for B.D.S. to be certain they will never resurface because it is impossible to know if anyone has copied them," tribunal vice-chair Eric Regehr wrote in his decision.
What is a 'nearly nude' image?
The first question the tribunal had to answer in the case was whether or not the images B.D.S. shared were intimate ones – which the legislation defines as ones that "depict or show the applicant as engaging in a sexual act, nude or nearly nude, or exposing their genitals, anal region, or breasts."
In the images, B.D.S. was shirtless but wearing underwear, he was not engaging in a sexual act nor was he exposing any of the body parts listed, the decision noted.
"Nearly nude" is not precisely defined in the law and so Regehr was left to interpret its meaning and decide if it applied in this case.
"It is somewhat ambiguous. The overall definition of 'intimate image' makes clear that the overarching purpose of the IIPA is to promote autonomy and privacy over images that are either intentionally sexual (like an intimate selfie) or may be sexualized by others (like a surreptitiously taken image in a change room or bathroom)," he wrote.
"The term 'nearly nude' must be interpreted in that spirit."
While one obvious component of being "nearly nude" is a lack of clothing – Regehr said context is also key, a point he illustrated using the example of a woman in a bikini.
"Surreptitious footage from a change room of a woman trying on a bikini would likely be an intimate image, whereas a photo of a public beach that includes a distant shot of the same woman in the same bikini likely would not be," he explained.
In this case, B.D.S. was wearing underwear that were "small but not more revealing than many swimsuits," the decision said – but the photos were selfies and they were taken and shared for a "flirtatious or seductive purpose."
While B.D.S. was not exposing his genitalia, "the outline of BDS’s erect penis is plain to see" in one photo. In the other, he is pulling down his underwear to expose "much" of one of his buttocks.
"The IIPA is designed to protect a person’s autonomy over photos like these," Regehr wrote.
Were the images shared without consent?
The second question the tribunal had to answer was if B.D.S. had a reasonable expectation of privacy when sharing the image with M.W. The tribunal found that he did.
"The photos were taken at his home and he sent the photo only to M.W. as part of a private, intimate chat. He never gave M.W. consent to share them with anyone," Regehr wrote.
M.W. admitted to sharing the images with another person, but argued he had a valid reason to do so, namely to help a woman who had been bullied online identify the person who allegedly harassed her.
M.W. also said that he attempted to crop the images so the intimate parts were not visible. However, the tribunal found that regardless of M.W.'s motivation – the images were not actually cropped.
"I find that M.W. clearly went far beyond what was necessary to help (the woman) identify B.D.S. This only required a photo of his face," Regehr wrote.
Damages and orders
B.D.S was awarded the maximum damages the CRT can allow, which is significantly lower than what Canadian courts have awarded in the "very few published cases" involving the non-consensual sharing of intimate images.
"The IIPA empowers people to choose between the CRT, the provincial court, and the Supreme Court when claiming damages. There are pros and cons to each venue. B.D.S. chose the CRT’s faster and simpler process and in doing so limited his claim to the CRT’s $5,000 monetary limit," Regehr wrote.
In addition to damages, the tribunal also made a number of protection orders.
First, M.W. and anyone else who shared the images was ordered to delete or destroy them "immediately" and to make "every available effort" to prevent them from being shared in the future. Those efforts must include an attempt having them removed from social media platforms and de-indexed from search engines.
In addition, "internet intermediaries" are ordered to remove the photos, destroy them and de-index them.
Regehr noted that the legislation allows for further penalties in cases where an individual or company does not comply with these orders. Individuals can be fined $500 a day to a maximum of $10,000 and companies can be fined $5,000 per day up to a maximum of $100,000.
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
Norway, Ireland and Spain say they are recognizing a Palestinian state in a historic move
Norway, Ireland and Spain said on Wednesday they are recognizing a Palestinian state, in a historic but largely symbolic move that deepens Israel’s isolation more than seven months into its grinding war against Hamas in Gaza.
Thunderstorms with tornado risk in some areas in Ontario, snow elsewhere in Canada
Canadians can expect a mixed bag of weather, with forecasts warning of thunderstorms, heavy rain and snow in some areas across western Canada.
NEW How to remove ticks and what to know about these bloodsuckers
Ticks are parasitic bloodsuckers, capable of spreading deadly disease, and they’re becoming increasingly common. Here’s what you need to know about them.
Montreal photographer captures dramatic Canada goose vs. fox fight on video
A Montreal photographer captured the moment a Canada goose defended itself from a fox at the Botanical Garden.
Canadians feel grocery inflation getting worse, two in five boycotting Loblaw: poll
Almost two-thirds of Canadians feel that inflation at the grocery store is getting worse, a new poll suggests, even as food inflation has been steadily cooling.
opinion Joe Biden uses bully pulpit to bully Donald Trump on debates
Donald Trump had spent weeks needling U.S. President Joe Biden for his refusal to commit to a debate. But Washington political columnist Eric Ham describes how in one fell swoop, Biden ingeniously stole the issue from the Trump campaign and made it his own.
Barbie will make dolls to honour Venus Williams, Christine Sinclair and other athletes
Barbie dolls will honour Canadian soccer star Christine Sinclair and tennis champion Venus Williams, plus seven other athletes as part of a project announced by Mattel on Wednesday.
Ontario mother loses $2,500 to text scammer pretending to be daughter
An Ontario mother lost $2,500 to a scammer pretending to be her daughter asking for help in late April.
From AI running wild to collapsing ecosystems, government report outlines future disruptions
From artificial intelligence running wild to collapsing ecosystems, a new Canadian government report outlines 35 disruptions that could rattle the country in the near future.