Surrey homeowners fined for continuing to rent out illegal suites despite court order
Homeowners in Surrey who turned a single-family home into an "unauthorized and unpermitted" four-plex could be on the hook for as much as $19,000 after defying a court order telling them to stop renting out the suites, a judge has ruled.
A B.C. Supreme Court decision posted online Tuesday outlines the history of the dispute between the City of Surrey and property owners Sukhdev Singh and Kashmir Singh Sahota.
According to the court documents, the home was purchased in 2021 and the owners proceeded with "extensive renovations." By March of 2022, a two-suite addition had been built and a secondary suite had been added.
"The City of Surrey alleges the respondents did so without permits or required inspections and contrary to the 'stop work' orders, tickets, warnings from the City of Surrey, and the applicable bylaws," the court heard.
CONTEMPT OF THE INJUNCTION
In April, the city applied for and was granted an injunction that ordered the owners to stop renting out the units. In September, they were found in contempt of that order.
"Despite the April order, the respondents continued to use the addition and the secondary suite as three separate rental units, which have been occupied by third parties in exchange for payment to the respondents," Justice John Gibb-Carsley wrote, summarizing his decision to find them in contempt.
"The respondents have also been using the upper floor of the house as a fourth rental unit for tenants."
THE PENALTY
At a November hearing, Gibb-Carsley provided his reasons for imposing an immediate financial penalty of $6,000 for the breach of the court order and a further $13,000 to be paid if the suites remain occupied on Jan. 1, 2023.
The City of Surrey argued that the owners made no attempt to "purge the contempt" by having the tenants vacate the property. The judge's decision noted that the owners provided signed agreements from three of the tenants saying they would leave – but that they were dated only one day before the hearing.
For their part, the owners told the court they knew they were violating city bylaws and the court order by renovating and renting the suites.
"The respondents stated that they 'never thought it would get this far.' They said that so many other people in Surrey are doing the same thing—that is, building and renting suites without permission—that they did not think this would happen," the decision says.
Singh and Sahota said they have "made sincere efforts" and spent a considerable amount of money trying to retroactively get the necessary building permits from the city.
Further, they said it was difficult to get the tenants to leave because "the respondents charge a low rent and … it is very difficult to find similar rental accommodations in the Lower Mainland." However, the judge said he had seen no evidence that there had been "concrete efforts" made to remove the tenants.
THE NEED FOR DETERRENCE
Gibb-Carsley, when explaining why he ordered the fine that he did, stressed the need to deter people from "blatantly" disregarding court orders. He also agreed with the City of Surrey that there are potential safety consequences to flouting building codes and the permitting process – even if these particular suites did not present any immediate danger.
"The practice of offering unlawful suites for rent and inviting members of the public to occupy uninspected buildings without occupancy permits to my mind poses at least a theoretical risk to the health and safety of the community," he wrote.
"To think otherwise would render the municipal building and occupancy bylaws meaningless."
In considering an appropriate penalty for the owners if they continue to rent out the suites past the Dec. 31 deadline, the judge said it needed to be significant enough to "blunt any financial incentives the respondents may have in continuing to remain in contempt."
Singh and Sahota have also been ordered to pay the municipality's legal costs.
"Given the City of Surrey is a local government, funded by taxpayers’ dollars, and was required to incur the costs of these contempt proceedings solely because of the respondents’ actions, it is appropriate," Gibb-Carsley wrote.
"I have some sympathy for the respondents and their stated belief that they could apply after the fact to remedy their various infractions. However, in my view, their actions have forced the City of Surrey to take steps and incur costs to enforce orders of this court."
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
Ottawa injects another $36M into vaccine injury compensation fund
The federal government has added $36.4 million to a program designed to support people who have been seriously injured or killed by vaccines since the end of 2020.
'Secret report' or standard research? B.C. government addresses safe supply allegations
B.C.’s premier and one of his top lieutenants are pushing back against allegations by the Official Opposition that he covertly commissioned a report into the diversion of safe supply drugs onto the streets.
Video shows suspects waving weapons, smashing glass in Toronto jewelry store robbery
Arrests have been made after five men were captured on video rampaging through a jewelry store in Toronto, waving weapons and smashing glass display cases.
'My stomach dropped': Winnipeg man speaks out after being criminally harassed following single online date
A Winnipeg man said a single date gone wrong led to years of criminal harassment, false arrests, stress and depression.
She was too sick for a traditional transplant. So she received a pig kidney and a heart pump
Doctors have transplanted a pig kidney into a New Jersey woman who was near death, part of a dramatic pair of surgeries that also stabilized her failing heart.
What Canadians think of the latest Liberal budget
A new poll suggests the Liberals have not won over voters with their latest budget, though there is broad support for their plan to build millions of homes.
opinion Why you should protect your investments by naming a trusted contact person
Appointing a trusted person to help with financial obligations can give you peace of mind. In his personal finance column for CTVNews.ca, Christopher Liew outlines the key benefits of naming a confidant to take over your financial responsibilities, if the need ever arises.
'One of the single most terrifying things ever': Ontario couple among passengers on sinking tour boat in Dominican Republic
A Toronto couple are speaking out about their 'extremely dangerous' experience on board a sinking tour boat in the Dominican Republic last week.
Teacher shortages see some Ontario high school students awarded perfect grades on midterm exams
Students at a high school in York Region have been awarded perfect marks on their midterm exams in three subjects – not because of their academic performances however, but because they had no teacher.