Landlord for Whistler, Surrey brewpubs may face corporate shakeup after court ruling
A dispute between shareholders of a B.C. numbered company that serves as a landlord for two well-known brewpubs has ended up in court.
A decision issued in B.C. Supreme Court last week and posted online Friday found that a 1996 agreement between shareholders in 471469 B.C. Ltd. – the landlord for High Mountain Brewing in Whistler and Big Ridge Brewing in Surrey – is still valid and binding on the current shareholders.
That means a notice from one of the company's owners invoking the agreement's so-called "shotgun clause" was legitimate – according to Justice Jan Brongers' decision – and the other owners will likely have to either sell their shares for $13.5 million or buy the first owner's shares for the same price.
The dispute over the numbered company arose from a disagreement between the two families that own it.
Since 2004, the company has been owned exclusively by members of the James and Wolverton families and entities controlled by them.
Triple F Investments Ltd. – a company "effectively owned and controlled by Mark James and members of his family," according to Brongers' decision – owns 50 per cent of the shares of the numbered company.
Wolverton Pacific Partnership – a company owned by brothers Brent and Mark Wolverton and Pacific Investment Corporation Limited, of which Brent Wolverton is CEO – owns 25 per cent of the shares. The remaining 25 per cent are owned by Pacific Investment directly, or by other members of the Wolverton family or entities controlled by them.
"The relationship between the James and Wolverton families regarding the company and its Whistler and Surrey brewpub restaurant businesses appears to have been a positive and cooperative one for many years," wrote Brongers in his decision.
"Furthermore, the two families also have a shared interest in a third brewpub restaurant located in Vancouver's Yaletown district."
The trouble arose in the spring of this year, however, according to Brongers. The judge wrote in his decision that Mark James and the Wolverton brothers disagreed about how to pay for structural repairs needed to the company's Whistler building.
James proposed that the two families jointly loan the numbered company the funds required to complete the project, or that Triple F provide the full amount of the loan at a "favourable rate," provided that the loan was secured by a mortgage.
"The Wolverton brothers responded to Mark James that they consider this proposal to be an ineffective 'Band Aid' solution to the company's problems, and that they are opposed to both the provision of operating loans by either party, as well as to encumbering the Company's assets any further," Brongers wrote.
"Instead, the Wolverton brothers proposed to Mark James that they discuss more broadly a new plan for moving forward with respect to all of the real estate, tenants, leases, management, and overhead issues relating to their shared restaurant brewpub businesses."
According to the court decision, James told the brothers he felt their proposal wouldn't solve the immediate need for funding to pay for construction and the Whistler building's mortgage. He again proposed a loan from Triple F to the numbered company and, when the brothers rejected this proposal, sent them notice that he intended to invoke the shotgun clause.
The brothers, through Wolverton Pacific Partnership, took Triple F to court. They argued that the 1996 agreement was no longer valid because 25 per cent of shares have changed hands since the agreement was signed and because the company's current shareholders "have behaved in a way that indicates that they no longer feel bound" by it.
Brongers rejected these arguments, writing in his decision that "abandonment" of a contract only occurs – in legal terms – if the conduct of the parties amounts to a new contract in which they agree to abandon the old one.
"No such intention has been shown to exist here," the judge wrote, adding that the argument that the change in shareholders invalidates the 1996 agreement was "without merit."
"I was not shown any authority that supports the novel proposition that a shareholders’ agreement ceases to be valid simply because one of its signatories no longer holds shares in the corporation, or because non signatories subsequently acquire some of its shares," he wrote.
Brongers also rejected Wolverton Pacific's argument that the necessary conditions for triggering the agreement's shotgun clause had not been met, and dismissed the company's petition, awarding court costs to Triple F.
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
Doctors ask Liberal government to reconsider capital gains tax change
The Canadian Medical Association is asking the federal government to reconsider its proposed changes to capital gains taxation, arguing it will affect doctors' retirement savings.
Keeping these exotic pets is 'cruel' and 'dangerous,' Canadian animal advocates say
Canadian pet owners are finding companionship beyond dogs and cats. Tigers, alligators, scorpions and tarantulas are among some of the exotic pets they are keeping in private homes, which pose risks to public safety and animal welfare, advocates say.
BREAKING Man wanted in connection with deadly shooting in Toronto tops list of most wanted fugitives in Canada
A 35-year-old man wanted in connection with the murder of Toronto resident 29-year-old Sharmar Powell-Flowers nine months ago has topped the list of the BOLO program’s 25 most wanted fugitives across Canada, police announced Tuesday.
Prince William and wife Kate thank public for birthday messages for son Louis
Prince William and his wife Kate thanked the public for their messages which had been sent to mark the sixth birthday of their youngest son Louis on Tuesday.
She was the closest she'd ever been to meeting her biological father. Then life dealt her a blow
Anne Marie Cavner was the closest she'd ever been to meeting her biological father, but then life dealt her a blow. From an unexpected loss to a host of new relationships, a DNA test changed her life, and she doesn't regret a thing.
How quietly promised law changes in the 2024 federal budget could impact your day-to-day life
The 2024 federal budget released last week includes numerous big spending promises that have garnered headlines. But, tucked into the 416-page document are also series of smaller items, such as promising to amend the law regarding infant formula and to force banks to label government rebates, that you may have missed.
Fire engulfs old Edmonton municipal airport hangar
A historical hangar at the former Edmonton municipal airport beside the NAIT main campus was on fire Monday night.
RCMP uncovers plot to sell drones and equipment to Libya
The RCMP says it has uncovered a ploy to sell Chinese drones and military equipment to Libya illegally.
Which foods have the most plastics? You may be surprised
'How much plastic will you have for dinner, sir? And you, ma'am?' While that may seem like a line from a satirical skit on Saturday Night Live, research is showing it's much too close to reality.