Landlord for Whistler, Surrey brewpubs may face corporate shakeup after court ruling
A dispute between shareholders of a B.C. numbered company that serves as a landlord for two well-known brewpubs has ended up in court.
A decision issued in B.C. Supreme Court last week and posted online Friday found that a 1996 agreement between shareholders in 471469 B.C. Ltd. – the landlord for High Mountain Brewing in Whistler and Big Ridge Brewing in Surrey – is still valid and binding on the current shareholders.
That means a notice from one of the company's owners invoking the agreement's so-called "shotgun clause" was legitimate – according to Justice Jan Brongers' decision – and the other owners will likely have to either sell their shares for $13.5 million or buy the first owner's shares for the same price.
The dispute over the numbered company arose from a disagreement between the two families that own it.
Since 2004, the company has been owned exclusively by members of the James and Wolverton families and entities controlled by them.
Triple F Investments Ltd. – a company "effectively owned and controlled by Mark James and members of his family," according to Brongers' decision – owns 50 per cent of the shares of the numbered company.
Wolverton Pacific Partnership – a company owned by brothers Brent and Mark Wolverton and Pacific Investment Corporation Limited, of which Brent Wolverton is CEO – owns 25 per cent of the shares. The remaining 25 per cent are owned by Pacific Investment directly, or by other members of the Wolverton family or entities controlled by them.
"The relationship between the James and Wolverton families regarding the company and its Whistler and Surrey brewpub restaurant businesses appears to have been a positive and cooperative one for many years," wrote Brongers in his decision.
"Furthermore, the two families also have a shared interest in a third brewpub restaurant located in Vancouver's Yaletown district."
The trouble arose in the spring of this year, however, according to Brongers. The judge wrote in his decision that Mark James and the Wolverton brothers disagreed about how to pay for structural repairs needed to the company's Whistler building.
James proposed that the two families jointly loan the numbered company the funds required to complete the project, or that Triple F provide the full amount of the loan at a "favourable rate," provided that the loan was secured by a mortgage.
"The Wolverton brothers responded to Mark James that they consider this proposal to be an ineffective 'Band Aid' solution to the company's problems, and that they are opposed to both the provision of operating loans by either party, as well as to encumbering the Company's assets any further," Brongers wrote.
"Instead, the Wolverton brothers proposed to Mark James that they discuss more broadly a new plan for moving forward with respect to all of the real estate, tenants, leases, management, and overhead issues relating to their shared restaurant brewpub businesses."
According to the court decision, James told the brothers he felt their proposal wouldn't solve the immediate need for funding to pay for construction and the Whistler building's mortgage. He again proposed a loan from Triple F to the numbered company and, when the brothers rejected this proposal, sent them notice that he intended to invoke the shotgun clause.
The brothers, through Wolverton Pacific Partnership, took Triple F to court. They argued that the 1996 agreement was no longer valid because 25 per cent of shares have changed hands since the agreement was signed and because the company's current shareholders "have behaved in a way that indicates that they no longer feel bound" by it.
Brongers rejected these arguments, writing in his decision that "abandonment" of a contract only occurs – in legal terms – if the conduct of the parties amounts to a new contract in which they agree to abandon the old one.
"No such intention has been shown to exist here," the judge wrote, adding that the argument that the change in shareholders invalidates the 1996 agreement was "without merit."
"I was not shown any authority that supports the novel proposition that a shareholders’ agreement ceases to be valid simply because one of its signatories no longer holds shares in the corporation, or because non signatories subsequently acquire some of its shares," he wrote.
Brongers also rejected Wolverton Pacific's argument that the necessary conditions for triggering the agreement's shotgun clause had not been met, and dismissed the company's petition, awarding court costs to Triple F.
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
Ottawa public school board, 3 Toronto-area school boards launch lawsuit against social media giants
The Ottawa-Carleton District School Board and three school boards in the Toronto-area have launched legal action against social media giants, accusing them of "disrupting students' fundamental right to education."
Several flight attendants from Pakistan have gone missing after landing in Canada
Multiple flight attendants from Pakistan International Airlines have abandoned their jobs and are believed to have sought asylum in Canada in the past year and a half, a spokesperson for the government-owned airline says.
Tipping is off the table at this Toronto restaurant
A Toronto restaurant introduced a surprising new rule that reduced the cost of a meal and raised the salaries of staff.
Rainfall warnings of up to 90 mm among weather alerts in effect for 7 provinces
Rainfall warnings of up to 90 millimetres, air quality advisories and other alerts have been issued for seven Canadian provinces, according to the latest forecasts.
King Charles calls for acts of friendship in first public remarks since Kate's cancer diagnosis
King Charles III gave public remarks for Maundy Thursday, addressing the importance of acts of friendship, following his and Catherine, Princess of Wales’ cancer diagnoses.
A Nigerian woman reviewed some tomato puree online. Now she faces jail
A Nigerian woman who wrote an online review of a can of tomato puree is facing imprisonment after its manufacturer accused her of making a “malicious allegation” that damaged its business.
Donald Trump assails judge and his daughter after gag order in N.Y. hush-money criminal case
Donald Trump lashed out Wednesday at the New York judge who put him under a gag order that bars him from commenting publicly about witnesses, prosecutors, court staff and jurors in his upcoming hush-money criminal trial.
A fight to protect the dignity of Michelangelo's David raises questions about freedom of expression
Michelangelo's David has been a towering figure in Italian culture since its completion in 1504. But in the current era of the quick buck, curators worry the marble statue's religious and political significance is being diminished.
Democrat who ran on abortion rights flips seat in deeply conservative Alabama
Marilyn Lands, who campaigned on abortion rights in deeply conservative Alabama, won a special election to the Alabama Legislature, in a victory that Democrats say illustrates voter backlash to extreme reproductive restrictions imposed by Republicans.