Dog custody dispute between B.C. exes highlights complexity of proving ownership
A B.C. woman has been ordered to return a dog she says she received as a gift through a verbal agreement and repay hundreds of dollars for a pet deposit.
The ownership dispute, outlined in a recent B.C. Civil Resolution Tribunal decision, was between two parties who disagreed about who owned a Rottweiler named Onyxia.
The decision explained Elaine Hughes and Philip Arnold, who were in a relationship and bought Onyxia together in 2017, believed they had joint ownership of the dog. However, Lori Arscott, who was later in a relationship with Arnold until 2021, claimed Onyxia was gifted to her.
"I accept that all parties are emotionally attached to Onyxia," wrote Andrea Ritchie in her decision. "However, the law treats pets as personal property, rather than family members."
Ritchie explained both Arnold and Hughes agreed Onyxia would be shared between the two of them after the end of their relationship. But Arscott said she didn't know about this arrangement "before Onyxia was allegedly gifted" to her.
Ritchie said all three contributed to caring for Onyxia, both physically and financially, until February 2021.
"On Feb. 16, 2021, Mr. Arnold asked for Onyxia, and Ms. Arscott declined to give Onyxia to him. Ms. Hughes and Mr. Arnold have been denied access to Onyxia since this date," Ritchie wrote.
"Mr. Arnold and Ms. Hughes seek an order that Ms. Arscott return Onyxia to them, because they say they are the dog’s rightful owners."
The tribunal heard both Arnold and Arscott disagreed over whether Onyxia was ever permanently gifted to Arscott, who claimed this was arranged through a verbal agreement. However, Ritchie determined there was no evidence to prove that conversation happened.
In CRT submissions, those making a claim must prove it on a balance of probabilities.
"Although all parties contributed to Onyxia’s care over the years, I find Ms. Hughes and Mr. Arnold have a stronger ownership claim over her, as they have remained intimately involved in her care and expenses," Ritchie wrote.
"I order Ms. Arscott to return the dog to Ms. Hughes and Mr. Arnold."
Arscott was also ordered to pay nearly $1,000 for CRT fees, a pet deposit covered by Arnold and applicable interest. Ritchie ruled Arscott wasn't entitled to any expenses because "all three parties contributed to Onyxia's care."
Arscott was ordered to return Onyxia to Arnold and Hughes within 30 days.
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
Montreal doctors' breakthrough discovery about causes of cerebral palsy giving hope
A breakthrough discovery made by doctors at the Montreal Children's Hospital about the causes of cerebral palsy is giving new hope to one West Island family.
Weather alerts issued for 7 provinces, 1 territory
Warnings of up to 60 millimetres of rain and other alerts have been issued for seven Canadian provinces and one territory ahead of the Easter weekend.
Ontario homeowner on the hook for $27,000 when contractor severed power line
An Ontario man who built a garage on his property has been locked in a battle with his electricity provider for a year and half over a severed power line.
For years she thought her son had died of an overdose. The police video changed all that
Austin Hunter Turner died in 2017, on a night that his mother has rewound and replayed again and again, trying to make sense of what happened.
Feeling older than you are? It could be how you sleep
Not getting enough sleep may cause you to feel five to 10 years older than you really are, according to two new studies.
Grandparent scam: London, Ont., senior beats fraudsters not once, but twice
It was a typical Tuesday for Mabel Beharrell, 84, until she got the call that would turn her world upside down. Her teenaged grandson was in trouble and needed her help.
CRA no longer requiring 'bare trust' reporting in 2023 tax return
The Canada Revenue Agency announced Thursday it will not require 'bare trust' reporting from Canadians that it introduced for the 2024 tax season, just four days before the April 2 deadline.
Why Kim Kardashian is being sued for 'knockoff' furniture
The estate of minimalist contemporary artist Donald Judd filed a lawsuit against Kardashian this week, claiming the fashion and beauty mogul promoted 'cheap knockoffs' of his furniture designs.
Where is the worst place for allergy sufferers in Canada?
The spring allergy season has started early in many parts of Canada, with high levels of pollen in some cities already. Experts weigh in on which areas have it worse so far this season.