Court untangles 'bizarre mess' that allowed Vancouver duplex owner to pay off mortgage after foreclosure, sale
A B.C. Supreme Court judge has ruled on a case she describes as a "bizarre mess" in a decision issued earlier this week.
At issue before Justice Carla L. Forth was the question of who is the rightful owner of a duplex on East 41st Avenue in Vancouver, which is the subject of three separate and – in some ways – competing foreclosure proceedings.
The property in question was built in 2015, according to BC Assessment. It is a two-storey duplex with a total of four bedrooms and four bathrooms across the two units.
Its value as of July 1, 2023, is listed as $2,567,000.
The original owner of the property is 1022724 B.C. Ltd., a numbered company directed by Rajvir Singh Parmar.
The company – referred to throughout Forth's decision as "1022" – remains the registered owner of the property, but the decision makes clear that the property should have been transferred to a different owner back in 2021.
At that time, the decision indicates, the court granted a "vesting order," which stipulated that the property would be sold to Madan Joshi for $2,238,000.
The first foreclosure
The vesting order was the culmination of the first foreclosure proceeding involving the property, which was initiated by Samra Enterprises Inc. and Colossal Fortune Holdings Ltd., who held the first mortgage on the property.
The court granted Samra and Colossal an order for possession of the building in March 2019, with a six-month "redemption period" during which 1022 and Parmar could pay off the mortgage and avoid a sale of the property.
When that period expired without the property being redeemed, the court granted Samra and Colossal "exclusive conduct" of the property's sale, according to Forth's decision.
Joshi signed a contract of purchase and sale with Samra and Colossal in January 2021, and the court approved the vesting order for the sale in March of that year.
The vesting order called for the sale to be completed on April 7, but allowed the parties to extend the completion date by 14 days if they agreed to do so.
Forth's decision indicates they did just that, quoting from an email sent by Samra and Colossal's lawyer to Joshi's lawyer indicating that the completion date had been extended to April 21.
However, despite the extension apparently being agreed to, when 1022 and Parmar contacted the lenders about paying off the mortgage on April 15, the lenders processed the payment and discharged their certificate of pending litigation from the property's title.
Parmar and 1022 financed the repayment of the Samra and Colossal mortgage by securing two other mortgages against the property. The owners have since defaulted on those two mortgages as well, and additional foreclosure proceedings are underway.
Order must be set aside
The problem, according to Forth's decision, is that Parmar and 1022 should never have been able to get those mortgages in the first place, because their right to redeem the first mortgage was, legally speaking, extinguished when the vesting order was granted.
Despite this, the vesting order has never been fulfilled, and Parmar and 1022 remain the owners, three and a half years after the duplex should have been transferred to Joshi.
Given this reality, Forth framed her decision as one regarding what to do with the vesting order.
"Ultimately, the issue I must address is whether there are extraordinary circumstances or, in the alternative, if it is in the interests of justice, for the court to exercise its equitable discretion to set aside the vesting order," the judge's decision reads.
"This is a difficult decision because any decision I make will cause prejudice to at least one innocent party."
Forth began her analysis of that question by noting that "the facts in this case are unique" and "no analogous case could be located."
She concluded that the vesting order must be set aside.
"The completion date has long passed and the sale of the property never completed, as a result of the Samra/Colossal mortgage being discharged," the decision reads. "The current terms of the vesting order are not enforceable."
Setting the vesting order aside allows the redemption of the first mortgage to stand, which means the lenders of the second and third mortgages can proceed with their foreclosures on the property.
"I accept that Mr. Joshi will suffer a loss if the vesting order is set aside," Forth's decision reads.
"However, in my view, Mr. Joshi has a claim in damages that he can bring against Samra, Colossal, and likely (their lawyer) Mr. Richards, for his losses. In addition, if Mr. Joshi still wants to purchase the property, he can make an offer in the second and third foreclosure proceedings to purchase it. Mr. Joshi will likely have to pay a higher price for the property, but doing so will support his claim for damages against Samra, Colossal, and likely Mr. Richards for their alleged wrongdoing."
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
'Canada will be absolutely fine': Justin Trudeau, his ministers and Pierre Poilievre congratulate Donald Trump
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and members of his cabinet congratulated Donald Trump Wednesday morning on his second United States presidential election win, amid questions about how the federal government intends to navigate a second term.
What Donald Trump's election victory could mean for Canada
Following president-elect Donald Trump's decisive election victory, there are sure to be significant knock-on effects for Canada. Here's a look at the different areas in which a second Trump presidency may affect Canadians.
Kamala Harris concedes: Here's what she said in her speech
Democratic Vice-President Kamala Harris has conceded the U.S. election to Republican Donald Trump.
Who won the popular vote? U.S. election vote totals from the past 40 years
Donald Trump won the U.S. presidency on Tuesday, and as of Wednesday morning, was also ahead in the popular vote. Historically, though, the candidate with the most votes hasn’t always won the contest.
Canada orders wind up of TikTok's Canadian business, app access to continue
Canada ordered the dissolution of TikTok's Canadian business after a national security review of the Chinese company behind the social media platform.
Newfoundland hockey player suspended, banned from local arena after off-ice fight with fan
A combination of a thrown stick and thrown punches have given a senior hockey player in Newfoundland a three-game suspension and an indefinite ban from one of his league's six arenas.
Sleepy during the day? You may be at higher risk for a pre-dementia syndrome, study finds
If you find yourself sleepy during your daily activities in your older age, you may need to consider it more than an inconvenience — since the fatigue may indicate you’re at higher risk for developing a condition that can lead to dementia, a new study has found.
4 ways in which Donald Trump's election was historic
Donald Trump's election victory was history-making in several respects, even as his defeat of U.S. Vice-President Kamala Harris prevented other firsts. She would have been the nation's first Black and South Asian woman to be president.
Kingston, Ont. doctor fighting OHIP clawback of $660K in pandemic vaccination payments
A Kingston doctor is in a dispute with the Ontario Ministry of Health, which is trying to clawback more than $600,000 in OHIP payments.