Company must refund $1-million deposit after failing to complete West Vancouver home on time, court rules
A West Vancouver company has been ordered to repay a homebuyer's $1-million deposit after it failed to complete construction on the property in time.
According to a B.C. Supreme Court decision issued last week and published online Monday, Zihao Yan – also known as Tony Yan – entered a contract with Benbow Residences Inc. in 2018 to purchase a home on Benbow Road in the district's Westmount neighbourhood for $5.38 million.
Under the agreement, the court decision indicates, Yan would take possession of the property on Nov. 15, 2018, and the closing date for the transaction would be Oct. 30, 2019.
Before the closing date, Benbow Residences was required to complete construction on the home – including addressing 43 "deficiencies" identified after an inspection – and to provide an occupancy permit.
Yan took possession as planned in November 2018, with construction ongoing, according to the decision. He spent December 2018 and January 2019 in China, expecting that he would return to find the deficiencies addressed and construction completed.
"When Mr. Yan returned from China, not only were many of the deficiencies not fixed, but the property was in a state of upheaval," reads B.C. Supreme Court Justice Sandra M. Sukstorf's decision.
"For example, the driveway was dug up and was unusable, there was no working boiler to heat the pool and hot tub, the smart controls in the home did not work, the security system did not work, and the patio doors did not close."
"A similar state of affairs continued until late October 2019," the decision notes.
Nonetheless, Yan continued to prepare to complete the purchase, according to Sukstorf's decision.
He secured a $2.7-million mortgage and liquidated investments worth another $1.86 million to combine with his $1 million deposit and account for the purchase price.
Yan also obtained property insurance and instructed his lawyers to "take the necessary steps to complete the transaction," according to the decision.
While Yan was prepared to complete his purchase, the decision indicates, Benbow Residences was not.
"The defendant’s conveyancing lawyer initially forwarded (Yan’s lawyer's) office an occupancy permit for an entirely different property," the decision reads.
"When this was brought to their attention, the defendant’s conveyancing lawyer then suggested that the correct occupancy permit must have already been provided. The evidence confirmed that the defendant had not obtained an occupancy permit on the date of closing and would not obtain one until Sept. 17, 2020, some 10 months after the completion date."
Defendant stopped responding
When the transaction was not completed as planned, Yan's lawyer sent a letter to Benbow Residences informing the company that it had breached a fundamental term of the contract, and requested the return of Yan's deposit, according to the court decision.
Benbow Residences did not return the deposit, so Yan filed his lawsuit.
Phil Garrow, the company's president and director, filed a response to the lawsuit and a counterclaim alleging that it was Yan, not Benbow Residences, that had repudiated the contract.
The decision indicates Garrow initially corresponded with Yan's lawyers and participated in the court process, but later stopped communicating and did not participate in the trial.
Sukstorf determined that the trial should continue in the defendant's absence, noting that Garrow and his company were aware of the trial date and their obligations, and had demonstrated through earlier non-compliance a failure to "engage meaningfully in the litigation."
"If the defendant later seeks to set aside the judgment, he will need to provide a compelling explanation for his absence and demonstrate that his previous conduct was not indicative of an intention to abandon his defence," the decision reads.
Sukstorf had no trouble concluding that Yan was "ready, willing and able" to complete his purchase, and that Garrow and Benbow Residences had "repudiated" the contract.
Given this, Yan was within his rights to accept the company's repudiation of the contract and demand repayment of his $1-million deposit. The judge awarded him that amount.
She also awarded Yan special costs, citing Garrow and Benbow Properties' repeated failure to comply with "court orders and procedural obligations."
Sukstorf listed five document disclosure requests that the defendant "ignored," along with two orders issued by other judges with which the company "did not comply."
"In my view, the defendant’s repeated failure to comply with court orders, despite receiving clear instructions and multiple opportunities to do so, demonstrates a consistent disregard for the court’s authority that is deserving of rebuke," Sukstorf's decision reads.
"This behavior not only prejudiced Mr. Yan but also burdened the court system by necessitating repeated judicial intervention to enforce basic procedural requirements."
The amount Yan will be entitled to recover as special costs remains to be determined, according to the decision.
Notably, it appears that the company may have been dissolved. A company called Benbow Residences Inc. is among a list of hundreds of companies that were dissolved on July 3, 2023, according to a document published by B.C.'s Ministry of Citizens' Services.
"In the event of difficulty in recovering the $1 million, Mr. Yan may apply for such further relief as is necessary on notice to the defendant," Sukstorf's decision concludes.
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
Live U.S. election results: Trump, Harris notch wins in first AP race calls as polls close in several states
As American voters cast their ballots for either Kamala Harris or Donald Trump today, CTVNews.ca has live updates and results from the U.S. election as they come in across the country.
A sharply divided America decides between Trump and Harris
A divided America weighed a stark choice for the nation's future Tuesday as a presidential campaign marked by upheaval and rancor approached its finale.
Who's going to win? The election prediction roundup
Outlets across the United States have been crunching numbers, parsing polls and working their magic models to predict the outcome of Tuesday’s presidential election.
How exit polls work and what they will tell us on election night
Exit polls are a set of surveys that ask voters whom they voted for, as well as additional questions about their political opinions, the factors they considered in the election and their own backgrounds more broadly.
These swing states will likely decide the U.S. presidential election
These swing states will most likely determine the path to the presidency, with candidates needing to win some combination of votes to get them across the 270 mark to secure a majority.
Canada 'deeply concerned' after alleged Russian sabotage plot
The Canadian government says it has raised concerns directly with Russian officials after media reports this week revealed an alleged Russian sabotage operation. The alleged plot included plans to send parcels packed with incendiary devices aboard aircraft destined for Canada and the United States.
Trump campaign denies and revokes journalists' election night credentials after critical coverage
Journalists from multiple news organizations have been denied credentials to former U.S. President Donald Trump’s election night watch event in West Palm Beach, Florida, in retaliation for their coverage of Trump’s campaign.
Trump snaps at reporter when asked about abortion: 'Stop talking about that'
Donald Trump is refusing to say how he voted on Florida's abortion measure -- and getting testy about it.
Tropical Storm Rafael chugs past Jamaica as Cuba prepares for another hurricane hit
Tropical Storm Rafael was chugging past western Jamaica on Tuesday and was expected to strengthen into a hurricane as it headed toward Cuba.