B.C. woman can sue bank for allowing her to transfer $69K to fraudsters, appeal court rules
B.C.'s highest court has given new life to a fraud victim's case against her bank, which she alleges had a duty to warn her about scams that had been reported in the community before allowing her to transfer $69,000 overseas.
A B.C. Supreme Court judge had previously granted the bank's application to dismiss the case on the grounds that there was no reasonable prospect that the fraud victim – Li Zheng – would succeed in a trial.
The B.C. Court of Appeal disagreed, ordering the bank's application for summary judgment to be dismissed, and allowing the original case to proceed.
THE FRAUD
Writing for the appeal court's three-judge panel, Justice Susan Griffin summarized the facts alleged in Zheng's initial lawsuit.
"Ms. Zheng alleges that she received a phone call on May 15, 2018, from a person purporting to be with the Chinese consulate," the decision reads.
"The person had the number from her driver’s license, which was only one month old. The person told her that the international police were looking for her and that she was accused of being involved in an international money laundering case."
The fraudsters told Zheng that she would have to fly back to China to stay in jail during the investigation or transfer funds to Hong Kong, which would be returned to her after the investigation.
One week later, on May 22, Zheng went to a branch of the Bank of China (Canada) in Richmond and asked a teller to help her send $69,000 from her account to an account in someone else's name in one of the bank's branches in Hong Kong.
As part of the transfer process, Zheng signed an "application for remittance" that included an "exclusion-of-liability clause" releasing the bank from legal responsibility for problems arising from the transfer.
Zheng alleged that neither the teller nor another bank employee she spoke to asked her any questions about the transfer, though the bank's response to her claim indicated that internal control and compliance officer Bin Zhang asked about the relationship between Zheng and her intended recipient.
"(Zhang) deposed that he asked her this because it was an international transaction greater than $10,000, but Ms. Zheng did not answer his question," Griffin wrote in her decision.
"He deposed that he 'did not notice anything out of the ordinary.'"
Zheng learned in June 2018 that she had been the victim of fraud, and that scams of this type had been reported on in local media before she made her transaction, according to the decision.
She filed her lawsuit in August 2020, alleging that "the bank knew of this prevailing fraud at the time of the transaction" and had a duty to warn her about it.
THE DISMISSAL
The bank's application to dismiss the case was first heard by a master of the B.C. Supreme Court, who granted it.
When Zheng appealed, a chambers judge reviewed the master's decision and did not find grounds for overturning it, though he disagreed with the master's conclusion that a claim based on the bank having a duty to inform Zheng of the fraud was bound to fail.
It was possible, the chambers judge wrote, that the bank would have a duty to "at least make an inquiry with Ms. Zheng about the potential for fraud," if Zheng's allegation that the fraud was "prevailing" in major Canadian cities at the time was found to be accurate.
"I would suggest that much turns on the extent of what the bank knew, or ought to have known, about this particular scheme and how specific that information was," the chambers judge wrote, as quoted in Griffin's appeal decision.
Despite this, the chambers judge dismissed Zheng's initial appeal, upholding the outcome of the master's initial decision, because he found the exclusion clause would apply and "there was no reasonable prospect that Ms. Zheng could establish her loss was solely caused by the bank’s negligence or wilful misconduct," Griffin summarized.
THE APPEAL
This line of reasoning is where the appeal judges disagreed with the chambers judge. While they accepted that the exclusion clause would defeat Zheng's claim if it applied, they disagreed with the chambers judge's finding that it must apply.
"The judge failed to consider that … Ms. Zheng has an available argument at trial that the bank’s error arose before the processing of the transfer instructions and therefore outside of the context and application of the exclusion clause," Griffin wrote.
If the bank had a duty to warn Zheng about the possibility of fraud, that duty could have come into play as soon as she inquired about making such a large transfer, before the bank asked her to sign the exclusion clause, the appeal judges concluded.
"I see the application and interpretation of the exclusion clause in this case as depending on the facts of the bank’s knowledge of the prevailing fraud and its duty to warn Ms. Zheng before it asked her to provide a signed application for remittance," Griffin wrote. "Since there is a genuine issue for trial about those facts, the judge ought not to have interpreted the exclusion clause as barring the claim."
Accordingly, the appeal judges allowed Zheng's appeal, set aside the chambers judge's order, and substituted an order that the bank's application to dismiss the case be, itself, dismissed.
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
How quietly promised law changes in the 2024 federal budget could impact your day-to-day life
The 2024 federal budget released last week includes numerous big spending promises that have garnered headlines. But, tucked into the 416-page document are also series of smaller items, such as promising to amend the law regarding infant formula and to force banks to label government rebates, that you may have missed.
Which foods have the most plastics? You may be surprised
'How much plastic will you have for dinner, sir? And you, ma'am?' While that may seem like a line from a satirical skit on Saturday Night Live, research is showing it's much too close to reality.
opinion I've been a criminal attorney for decades. Here's what I think about the case against Trump
Joey Jackson, a criminal defence attorney and a legal analyst for CNN, outlines what he thinks about the criminal case against Donald Trump in the 'hush money trial.'
$3.8M home in B.C.'s Okanagan has steel shell for extra wildfire protection
A home in B.C.'s Okanagan that features a weathering steel shell designed to provide some protection against wildfires has been listed for sale at $3.8 million.
Diver pinned under water by an alligator figured he had choice. Lose his arm or lose his life
An alligator attacked a diver on April 15 as he surfaced from his dive, nearly out of air. His tank emptied with the gator's jaws crushing the arm he put up in defence.
Psychologist becomes first person in Peru to die by euthanasia after fighting in court for years
A Peruvian psychologist who suffered from an incurable disease that weakened her muscles and had her confined to her bed for several years, died by euthanasia, her lawyer said Monday, becoming the first person in the country to obtain the right to die with medical assistance.
Mystery surrounds giant custom Canucks jerseys worn by Lions Gate Bridge statues
The giant stone statues guarding the Lions Gate Bridge have been dressed in custom Vancouver Canucks jerseys as the NHL playoffs get underway.
Celebrity designer sentenced to 18 months in prison for smuggling crocodile handbags
A leading fashion designer whose accessories were used by celebrities from Britney Spears to the cast of the 'Sex and the City' TV series was sentenced Monday to 18 months in prison after pleading guilty in Miami federal court on charges of smuggling crocodile handbags from her native Colombia.
Wildfire leads to evacuation order issued for northeast Alberta community
An evacuation order was issued on Monday afternoon for homes in the area of Cold Lake First Nation.